By Martin Smith -- 12 August 2018

It’s not often one of our members’ games features in a GM video, especially when our man is complimented on his play. But Robin ‘Hacker’ Haldane has done it again, to maintain his 50% record against the ‘Ginger GM’ Simon Williams (+1, =2, -1). The game was played in round four of the Battersea Summer League: with our squad appearing under the dodgy title “Mean Streats”, courtesy of Richard Tillett’s fertile imagination (it gets worse: our second team’s moniker was “Dire Streats”).

The link to Simon’s video is at the end. He is graciously generous in his praise; and provides an interesting insight into his own mindset for the game. For his part, Robin didn’t shirk the fight, coming at his opponent (also well-known for a certain belligerence at the board) right out of the opening, and then tenaciously holding on for a draw in the notoriously difficult R & B v R ending.



You can see the full game animation, including the ending, below - with Robin’s own insights, especially at move 23 when there was a spectacular winning sequence for White. It was the one that, sadly, got away. The video also discusses this, and some sensational stuff at move 17; but it skips the detail of the last 70-odd moves as they battled it out towards a cagey draw under the ’50-move’ rule. There is, though, a useful tip – should you ever end up there - as to how the superior side might turn the screw in R & B v R.

R. Haldane S. Williams Battersea Summer League | Round 4 | 2018.08.07 | 1/2-1/2
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
a
1
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 g6 6. Be3 Bg7 7. f3 Nc6 8. Qd2 Bd7 9. Bc4 O-O 10. O-O-O Ne5 11. Bb3 b5 This pawn sac took me by surprise...I decided I needed to react by playing aggressively 12. Ndxb5 Qb8 13. Nd4 a5 14. a4 Rc8 15. h4 Nc4 16. Bxc4 Rxc4 17. b3 Rb4 18. h5 Qb7 19. hxg6 fxg6 20. Bh6 With the intention of provoking Nxe4; but I was worried about 20...Bh8 instead. Simon found the right defence on moves 21 and 22. There were plenty of ways to go wrong. Nxe4 21. Qe3 Bxd4 22. Rxd4 Nxc3 23. Qxc3 e5 When he played this I assumed I could not play 24. Rxd6 Rc8 25. Qxe5 as 25...Bf5 looks too strong. After the game it suddenly occurred to me I could have played 26. Rc6. Although I was short of time in the game, I should have looked a bit deeper. I think the fact that the bishop was on d7 a move earlier made me think Rc6 wasn't possible. 24. Rxb4 axb4 25. Qc4+ d5 26. Qc5 Bf5 27. Rd1 Rc8 28. Qxd5+ Qxd5 29. Rxd5 Rxc2+ 30. Kd1 Rxg2 31. Rxe5 Kf7 32. Bd2 h5 In this endgame I thought his h pawn would be quicker than my a pawn, so I aimed for R v R&B...though I assume Simon had a win at some point. 33. a5 Bd3 34. Re3 Bf1 35. Re1 Rf2 36. Bxb4 h4 37. Re7+ Kf6 38. Be1 Rxf3 39. Bxh4+ g5 40. Bxg5+ Kxg5 41. Rb7 Bd3 42. Kd2 Be4 43. Rb8 Kf4 44. a6 Rd3+ 45. Ke2 Rd7 46. Rf8+ Ke5 47. Re8+ Kd4 48. Re6 Rh7 49. Rd6+ Bd5 50. b4 Rh2+ 51. Kf1 Ra2 52. b5 Kc5 53. Rd8 Bc4+ 54. Ke1 Bxb5 55. Rc8+ Kd4 56. Ra8 Ke3 57. Kd1 Bd3 58. Kc1 Rc2+ 59. Kd1 Rc7 60. Re8+ Be4 61. Re6 Rc5 62. a7 Ra5 63. Kc1 Rxa7 64. Kb2 Kd4 65. Rd6+ Bd5 66. Rd8 Ra2+ 67. Kb1 Rh2 68. Kc1 Kc4 69. Rc8+ Kb3 70. Kd1 Bc4 71. Ke1 Re2+ 72. Kd1 Rf2 73. Ke1 Re2+ 74. Kd1 Re7 75. Rb8+ Kc3 76. Rc8 Rd7+ 77. Kc1 Ra7 78. Rb8 Ra1+ 79. Rb1 Ra2 80. Rb8 Rc2+ 81. Kd1 Rf2 82. Re8 Rf7 83. Re5 Kd3 84. Ke1 Kd4 85. Re8 Bd3 86. Kd2 Rf2+ 87. Kd1 Kc3 88. Re7 Rf3 89. Re8 Bc4 90. Re7 Rf1+ 91. Re1 Rf8 92. Re7 Bb5 93. Re5 Rf1+ 94. Re1 Rf2 95. Re6 Rf7 96. Re5 Bc6 97. Re3+ Kd4 98. Re6 Be4 99. Kc1 Kc3 100. Kd1 Bd3 101. Re8 Draw agreed


GM Simon Williams analysis

Login with Google or Facebook to leave a comment

Comments - 0